Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
108 use cases added today

How to use Claude to diagnose ISP peering problems

Claude identified a bad IX-Denver peering connection between the ISP and Fastly; the author later contacted the ISP and says it confirmed the diagnosis.

Source published news.ycombinator.comAgent: Claude
OUR ADAPTATION

Suggested prompt

Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.

Investigate [network symptoms] affecting [service and ISP]. Use available traceroutes, looking glasses and ASN peering information to identify likely routing or peering causes. Explain the evidence and produce a concise diagnosis I can verify with [network provider].

Evidence at a glance

Sourced account
Source author
linsomniac
Original account
Read the source ↗
Published
Source link checked
Reported result
Claude identified a bad IX-Denver peering connection between the ISP and Fastly; the author later contacted the ISP and says it confirmed the diagnosis.
Human involvement
The author assessed the diagnosis against known peering arrangements and contacted the ISP, which confirmed it.

A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.

Report an issue with this caseOpen correction email

Opens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.

How the agent did it

  1. Asked Claude to diagnose the organisation’s networking problem.
  2. Ran traceroutes and consulted looking glasses and ASN peering databases.
  3. Identified a suspected bad peering connection between the ISP and Fastly at IX-Denver.

During a networking problem, the author's coworker asked Claude to diagnose the issue while the author was switching to a mobile hotspot to determine whether the problem was local or external. Claude investigated with traceroutes, looking glasses and ASN peering databases.

It identified a bad peering connection at IX-Denver between the organisation's ISP and Fastly, and said the ISP needed to withdraw the advertisement. The author found this plausible because they already knew both networks peered at that exchange. That night, the author contacted the ISP to ask whether this had happened, and the ISP confirmed it.

The same post describes broader infrastructure work with Claude. It had updated Ansible YAML controlling Kafka and was building a script for the rolling update process. It also helped manage Nix configuration and packaged the Git Butler CLI. The author periodically asked it to review production syslog for security problems and five actionable improvements; that review identified Kafka configuration changes related to the rolling update work. The networking diagnosis is the case with external confirmation in the account.

Who it's for: infrastructure operators investigating network symptoms who can verify a diagnosis with the responsible provider.

Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)

Source: Hacker News · linsomniac

Frequently asked questions

What evidence did Claude consult?

The post reports traceroutes, looking glasses and ASN peering databases during the networking investigation.

How was the diagnosis verified?

The author already knew the ISP and Fastly peered at IX-Denver. They contacted the ISP that night, and report that it confirmed the diagnosis.

More details

Remaining steps

  1. Contacted the ISP that night and received confirmation of the diagnosis.

About this account

Claude investigated network paths and peering information and surfaced a specific suspected provider-side cause.

Platform: Hacker News. Attribution: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47806419. Prompt: Suggested (written by Agents In Use, not the author's). Sourced by the Agents In Use pipeline.

Credit: linsomniac on Hacker News

Source published

Added to Agents In Use

Source checked

Tools and topics

Claude · Traceroute · Looking glasses · ASN peering databases

Networking · ISP peering · Troubleshooting

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.