Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
108 use cases added today

Codex to map specialist therapy providers

Jane Arandelovic helped with a search for allied health therapists offering a particular specialist approach within a defined distance of a target suburb. The task was personal administration: produce a useful list to inspect and contact, rather than decide which clinician should provide care.

Source published linkedin.comAgent: Codex
OUR ADAPTATION

Suggested prompt

Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.

Find providers of this specialist approach within my chosen distance. Start with its official directory, record reasons and contact details, and map candidates for human verification.

Evidence at a glance

Sourced account
Source author
Jane Arandelovic
Original account
Read the source ↗
Published
Source link checked
Reported result
A Markdown report, spreadsheet, ranked shortlist and interactive map after about thirty minutes.
Human involvement
Humans still checked credentials, availability, fees, waitlists and suitability.

A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.

Report an issue with this caseOpen correction email

Opens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.

How the agent did it

  1. Define the specialist approach and travel-distance boundary without personal details.
  2. Research the official directory, then practice websites and contact information.
  3. Review the report, spreadsheet and map before contacting providers.

Jane Arandelovic helped with a search for allied health therapists offering a particular specialist approach within a defined distance of a target suburb. The task was personal administration: produce a useful list to inspect and contact, rather than decide which clinician should provide care.

Without supplying private personal details, she asked Codex to research the relevant providers, rank them by relevance, distance and public review signals, capture websites and contact details, and write short summaries. Codex began with the official authority directory for the specialist approach before checking individual practices and locations.

After about thirty minutes, the outputs included a Markdown report, spreadsheet, ranked shortlist and interactive map using OpenStreetMap data. The author found that combination useful because location and contact information could be reviewed together instead of remaining scattered across websites. The public illustration uses demo coordinates; it does not disclose the family's actual target location.

Arandelovic still required manual checks of registration or certification, current availability, fees, waitlists, contact details and whether a practice continued offering the required approach. Reviews were a practical signal, not clinical evidence. No appointment, provider acceptance or treatment outcome is reported. The copyable workflow is to begin with the specialist directory, preserve the reasons an option matches, and make the map and spreadsheet starting points for direct verification.

Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)

Source: www.linkedin.com · Jane Arandelovic

Frequently asked questions

Where did the research begin?

The official authority directory for the specialist therapy approach.

Was a therapist recommended or booked?

No. The outputs were a shortlist for human review and contact.

What still needed checking?

Credentials, current availability, fees, waitlists, contact details and suitability.

More details

About this account

Codex researched public provider information and produced a ranked shortlist and map.

Firsthand source opened and read. Suggested prompt written by us from the reported workflow; no original task prompt is quoted.

Credit: Jane Arandelovic

Source published

Added to Agents In Use

Source checked

Tools and topics

Markdown · Spreadsheet · OpenStreetMap

Provider directories · Appointment research · Local maps

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.