Grok Bot gathers book notes and asks Codex to finish the entry
Quanta's operator reports that Book Advisor gathered their notes after they finished Other Minds, asked Codex to write the final entry and saved it in Obsidian.
quanta-bits-newsletter.beehiiv.com
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Gather my existing notes for [finished book] from the authorised Obsidian vault. Ask the configured Codex tool to prepare a final entry based on those notes, identify gaps instead of inventing personal reactions, and save a clearly labelled draft for my reading review.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source author
- Reza, Quanta Bits
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- Source link checked
- Reported result
- The operator reports that Book Advisor gathered notes on Other Minds, obtained a finished entry from Codex and saved it in Obsidian.
- Human involvement
- The operator provides reading notes and configures outside-tool access and instructions. The account does not describe final approval of the saved entry.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- Maintain reading notes for Other Minds in the operator's Obsidian workflow.
- Ask Book Advisor to gather the notes after the book is finished.
- Have Grok Bot hand the final-entry writing task to the connected Codex tool.
Quanta's operator created a Grok Bot called Book Advisor to maintain a reading list and book notes in Obsidian. After finishing Other Minds, they report that the bot gathered their notes, asked Codex to write the final entry and saved the result.
The task connects an existing collection of personal reading notes to a finished entry in the operator's usual note system. Grok Bot coordinates the collection and handoff, while Codex supplies the final writing. This is a reported completed artifact, rather than a suggestion to ask an AI for a book summary.
The operator also explains how outside tools fit into this setup. Codex and an Anthropic tool are connected through APIs or command-line software, and such handoffs require technical setup and specific instructions. The source does not establish which transport carried this particular Codex request.
The newsletter describes a week of testing and notes connection failures, occasional computer restarts and difficulty identifying which model or machine handled work. The finished note is not published for inspection, and no final reading or approval step is described. The outcome therefore remains the operator's account of gathering, writing and saving an Obsidian entry.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: Newsletter · Reza, Quanta Bits
Frequently asked questions
Which book supplied the completed example?
The operator reports this workflow after finishing Other Minds.
What did Codex contribute?
Book Advisor asked Codex to write the final book entry before saving it in Obsidian.
Was the external-tool handoff automatic to set up?
No. The operator says connecting outside tools requires technical setup and explicit instructions, and does not identify the exact transport for this example.
More details
Remaining steps
- Save the resulting book entry into Obsidian.
About this account
Book Advisor collects existing notes, delegates final writing to Codex and saves the resulting entry in the operator's note system.
Primary participant account opened with web.run on 2026-10-15; original source date checked on the page. Outcomes are attributed reports, not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author.
Credit: Reza, Quanta Bits
Source published
Added to Agents In Use
Source checked
Tools and topics
Grok Bot · Codex · Obsidian
Book notes · Obsidian · Codex handoff
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.