Muse to shop a wardrobe and check a belt total
Amanda Smith asked Muse's mobile app to assemble a few fall wardrobe additions from her style interests. She supplied sizes and preferences, inspected the shopping links, and requested cheaper alternatives, black loafers and a belt she had noticed in a product image.
cnet.com
Original prompt
Shared by the source author. See source notes for context.
I want you to be my personal shopper and assemble my fall wardrobe with a few new pieces.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source author
- Amanda Smith
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- Source link checked
- Reported result
- A reported belt purchase following a $5 discrepancy, failed retries and an empty-cart discovery.
- Human involvement
- Smith reviewed links, handled the capture issue, confirmed the total and took over the browser.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- Provide sizes, style interests and feedback on shopping links.
- Select the belt and set up shipping and payment context.
- Inspect the actual cart and total when checkout figures conflict.
Amanda Smith asked Muse's mobile app to assemble a few fall wardrobe additions from her style interests. She supplied sizes and preferences, inspected the shopping links, and requested cheaper alternatives, black loafers and a belt she had noticed in a product image.
The search needed iteration. A TikTok capture problem required Smith to take control of the browser. She narrowed the options to a belt and corduroy pants, then chose to buy the belt while saving other links for later. Gmail and Google Calendar were left disconnected because she did not need them for this shopping task.
At checkout, Smith added shipping information and connected Stripe Link. Muse asked her to confirm a total including shipping, and she told it to proceed. But the displayed total kept showing $42, a $5 difference from what she saw when inspecting the browser. She found no hidden fee explaining it, and repeated retries did not produce an explanation.
A browser takeover revealed that the belt was not even in the cart. Smith nevertheless reports eventually buying it through Muse, with the final step taking about two minutes. This establishes a purchase account with human intervention, not evidence of an unexplained extra charge actually being collected. The useful lesson is the need to inspect the cart and total separately from a polished product shortlist.
Prompt
Original prompt
Source: www.cnet.com · Amanda Smith
Frequently asked questions
Did the app need Gmail access?
Smith left Gmail and Google Calendar disconnected for this task.
What did the browser inspection reveal?
The unexplained total differed by $5, and the belt was missing from the cart.
Was an extra $5 actually charged?
The source reports the discrepancy and eventual purchase, not a receipt proving an extra charge.
More details
About this account
Muse researched clothing and attempted the belt checkout.
Firsthand source opened and read. Prompt is a verbatim excerpt of the published original instruction.
Credit: Amanda Smith
Source published
Added to Agents In Use
Source checked
Tools and topics
Muse mobile app · Instagram · TikTok · Uniqlo · Stripe Link
Fall wardrobe · Checkout totals · Browser takeover
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.