Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
18 additions

WikiCrow writes cited drafts about human genes

FutureHouse ran WikiCrow to draft scientific summaries of human genes using full-text papers. Its PaperQA agent searched, gathered evidence and returned to retrieval when terminology or evidence required it.

Added futurehouse.orgAgent: WikiCrow
TRY A BOUNDED VERSION

Prompt to try

Editorial adaptation, not the source author’s exact prompt. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.

Using the accessible papers for [gene], draft a short research summary. Cite each substantive claim, separate direct evidence from inference and flag contradictions. Return to retrieval when evidence is missing. Produce a draft for expert review, not a publication-ready clinical reference.

What happened

FutureHouse reports producing draft gene articles and finding incorrect statements in its evaluation; drafts remain fallible.

Reported by FutureHouse / Sam Rodriques

How the agent did it

  1. Choose genes with missing or incomplete summaries and retrieve relevant scientific papers.
  2. Use PaperQA tools to gather evidence and synthesize referenced answers.
  3. Generate article drafts and evaluate sampled statements against the cited papers.

Where a person stepped in

Researchers audited sampled statements and warned readers to check claims against their citations.

A person approved each step before the agent continued.

More details

About this account

PaperQA adaptively chose search and evidence tools, including new searches from intermediate findings.

Primary research report of a completed corpus run. These were drafts, not a claim of accepted Wikipedia publication.

Credit: FutureHouse / Sam Rodriques

Source published 8 Dec 2023

Source checked 14 Oct 2026

Tools and topics

WikiCrow · PaperQA · SEARCH · GATHER_EVIDENCE · ANSWER_QUESTION · Semantic Scholar API

Research · Sources

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.