ChatGPT agent collects 200 Forbes companies
A first-day tester reports that ChatGPT agent collected 200 companies from five Forbes pages into a spreadsheet, needing restarts; a later LinkedIn-enrichment step remained only half complete.
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Collect companies from [five-page list] into a workbook. Track page coverage and expected row count. Then research [additional field], leaving gaps explicit. Report extraction and enrichment completeness separately.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →What happened
A first-day tester reports that ChatGPT agent collected 200 companies from five Forbes pages into a spreadsheet, needing restarts; a later LinkedIn-enrichment step remained only half complete.
Reported by u/mrbritchicago on RedditHow the agent did it
- Supply the Forbes list and its expected five-page scope.
- Collect the 200 companies into a spreadsheet.
- Re-prompt the agent to continue when context or confusion stops it.
Where a person stepped in
The user resumes stopped work and checks the file, correcting their initial success claim when LinkedIn links are missing from roughly half the rows.
A first-day ChatGPT agent tester supplies a Forbes list spanning five pages and asks for its two hundred companies in a spreadsheet. The agent ultimately completes that collection task, which the author distinguishes from an earlier unsuccessful attempt with Deep Research.
Completion needs supervision. The agent stops several times because of context limits or confusion, and the user re-prompts it to continue. The author then asks for company LinkedIn links in an additional column. At first they describe that extension as successful, but after checking the file they correct the claim: only about half the rows have a LinkedIn link.
That correction is the useful part of the account. It separates a completed paginated extraction from an incomplete enrichment stage, even though both sit in the same workbook. A saved spreadsheet and a confident response are not enough to establish that every requested column is filled. The source does not provide a downloadable audited file, explain deduplication or confirm every company's identity. The copyable workflow is to define the expected page and row coverage, resume interrupted collection and inspect each subsequent field separately before treating the combined file as finished. The suggested prompt asks for those checkpoints rather than reproducing an unavailable original instruction.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: Reddit · u/mrbritchicago on Reddit
Frequently asked questions
Which part actually finished?
The author reports completing the 200-company extraction from five Forbes pages into the spreadsheet.
Was LinkedIn enrichment complete?
No. After inspecting the file, the author corrected their claim and said roughly half the rows lacked links.
Was this a set-and-forget task?
No. Context limits and confusion repeatedly stopped work, requiring the user to re-prompt continuation.
More details
Remaining steps
- Inspect added enrichment columns separately from the original extraction.
About this account
ChatGPT agent navigates the paginated company list and writes a spreadsheet; the follow-on research column stalls and requires an explicit completeness check.
Firsthand account by u/mrbritchicago on Reddit; original publication date verified against Reddit created_utc 1753393627, converted to UTC calendar date. Outcomes are the author’s reports, not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use; not the author’s original prompt.
Credit: u/mrbritchicago on Reddit
Source published 24 Jul 2025
Source checked 14 Oct 2026
Tools and topics
ChatGPT agent · Forbes pages · Spreadsheet
Paginated extraction · Company list · Completeness checks
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.