Fo calls a colleague and returns the conversation
Early tester Chris Halton asked Fo to relay a message to a colleague. It identified itself as his agent, received an answer and returned a full transcript.
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Call [colleague] and relay [approved message]. Identify yourself as my agent, obtain their answer and return the conversation transcript to me. Do not make commitments beyond the message I supplied.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →What happened
Early tester Chris Halton asked Fo to relay a message to a colleague. It identified itself as his agent, received an answer and returned a full transcript.
Reported by Chris HaltonHow the agent did it
- Ask Fo to call a colleague and relay the intended message.
- Have the agent identify itself as acting for the caller.
- Receive the colleague’s answer through the phone conversation.
Where a person stepped in
Halton supplies the message and receives the transcript. The article does not expose the private exchange or establish additional approval steps during the call.
Chris Halton tried Fo as an early user and gave it a specific communication task: call a colleague and pass along his message. The colleague answered an ordinary phone call. Fo introduced itself as Halton’s agent, delivered the request, obtained the colleague’s answer and returned the full conversation transcript to Halton.
That final artifact makes this more concrete than a promise that an assistant can make calls. Halton could inspect the exchange afterward, and the person receiving the call was told they were speaking with an agent. The account does not publish the message itself, the colleague’s reply or the transcript, so their content and accuracy cannot be independently assessed.
Halton also connected his calendar during the trial, but that is separate from the demonstrated call. This case does not infer that calendar permission was necessary for the telephone task or that Fo booked a subsequent haircut.
The useful pattern is a bounded message relay with explicit identity and a returned record. The human supplies the communication intent; the agent handles the live exchange and brings the response back. Halton reports one successful test, not a demonstrated workflow for negotiations, financial commitments or repeated unattended calling. His article discusses wider telecom possibilities, but those predictions are not outcomes of this call.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: LinkedIn · Chris Halton
Frequently asked questions
Did the recipient know this was an agent?
Halton explicitly says Fo introduced itself as his agent before obtaining the colleague’s answer.
What did Halton receive afterward?
He reports receiving a full transcript. The private message, reply and transcript are not published in the article.
Does this demonstrate appointment booking?
No. Calendar-based routine preparation is also described, but an actual subsequent haircut booking is not confirmed.
More details
Remaining steps
- Inspect the full transcript Fo returns after the call.
About this account
Fo places the requested call, introduces itself as Halton’s agent, conducts the exchange and returns the answer with a full transcript.
Firsthand account by Chris Halton; original publication date verified against LinkedIn article visible Published Oct 2, 2026. Outcomes are the author’s reports, not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use; not the author’s original prompt.
Credit: Chris Halton
Source published 2 Oct 2026
Source checked 14 Oct 2026
Tools and topics
Fo · Telephone call · Returned transcript
Disclosed agent call · Colleague message relay · Conversation transcript
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.