Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
— use cases added today

Gemini CLI orchestrates a RAG reference migration

Remigiusz Samborski used Gemini CLI and Conductor to build a RAG migration reference architecture through approved plans, Terraform changes, tests and recorded checkpoints.

OUR ADAPTATION

Suggested prompt

Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.

Inspect this RAG migration repository and draft a Conductor specification and staged plan covering infrastructure, services and data validation. After I approve the plan, implement each track with tests, Terraform plans and recorded checkpoints, then report unresolved migration risks.

Evidence at a glance

Sourced account
Source author
Remigiusz Samborski
Original account
Read the source ↗
Published
28 Apr 2026
Source link checked
15 Oct 2026
Reported result
Samborski reports completing the reference architecture with linked plans, Terraform and checkpoint records, using roughly $30 in Vertex AI tokens.
Human involvement
Samborski approved specifications and plans, returned through notifications for feedback and used Antigravity for additional refinements.

A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.

Report an issue with this caseOpen correction email

Opens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.

How the agent did it

  1. Define product, stack and workflow documents through Conductor setup.
  2. Create a migration track and inspect Gemini-generated specification and plan.
  3. Approve implementation, then let Gemini run test and implementation cycles.

Remigiusz Samborski used Gemini CLI with the Conductor extension to coordinate a RAG migration reference architecture. The work crossed Terraform infrastructure, Python services, a Next.js interface and data pipelines involving BigQuery and AlloyDB. His account links the project repository and its saved specifications and implementation plans.

Each feature became a track. Gemini inspected the codebase, asked questions and wrote a specification and plan. Samborski reviewed those documents before implementation began. The agent then iterated through tasks, writing failing tests, implementing changes, refactoring and committing the work. Project instructions required Terraform plans before applies.

At phase boundaries the agent ran verification, supplied manual checking instructions and recorded results in Git notes and the plan. A sandbox notifier let Samborski return when his input was needed. He also used Antigravity for later code and documentation refinements.

The reported result was a multi-phase reference project with an auditable development history, rather than proof of a production migration at a customer. Samborski reports about $30 in Vertex AI token costs across several days, using several Gemini models and substantial cached input. That figure describes his run and excludes a general cost guarantee. Human approval, manual checking and the saved checkpoints remained part of the workflow throughout.

Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)

Source: DEV Community · Remigiusz Samborski

Frequently asked questions

What was approved before coding began?

Samborski reviewed and approved the track specification and implementation plan after Gemini inspected the codebase.

How were checkpoints recorded?

The account describes automated tests, manual verification instructions, Git notes and commit references in the implementation plan.

Was this a demonstrated customer production migration?

The source describes building a RAG migration reference architecture and links its repository; it does not establish a customer production cutover.

More details

Remaining steps

  1. Review phase verification, Git notes and checkpoints before continuing.

About this account

Gemini CLI inspected the repository, planned tracks, wrote and tested code and maintained implementation records across several project layers.

Firsthand source opened over HTTP and read on 2026-10-15. Publication date comes from the source page. Outcomes are author-reported and were not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use. DEV author publication timestamp verified; author links original Medium mirror, which returned HTTP 403. No production cutover inferred.

Credit: Remigiusz Samborski

Source published 28 Apr 2026

Source checked 15 Oct 2026

Tools and topics

Gemini CLI · Conductor · Terraform · Python · Next.js · BigQuery · AlloyDB

RAG migration · Conductor · Checkpoints

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.