How to use Hermes to build a skill inspection gate
Hermes helped build a skill installer with overlap checks, static inspection and backup routing. Its author documented false positives and runtime limits.
reddit.com
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Build a pre-install skill gate that checks existing capability overlap, inspects code and instructions with an available auditor or labelled static fallback, then backs up accepted files. Require review for high-risk warnings and clearly distinguish download-time inspection from runtime containment.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →What happened
A published skill-inspection and backup tool was built with Hermes. False positives and absent runtime containment remain explicit limits, without a measured security guarantee.
Reported by _P_R_I_M_E — RedditHow the agent did it
- The author and Hermes built capability comparison before downloading a requested skill.
- The tool added an adaptive inspection stage and accepted-file backup routing.
- The developer documented false positives, active-session limits and the absence of runtime containment.
Where a person stepped in
The developer chose the checks, reviewed high-risk false positives and retained manual override and runtime-isolation responsibilities.
_P_R_I_M_E built Skill Installer with Hermes Agent after repeatedly adding overlapping tools and losing installed skills when containers were rebuilt. The published artifact combines capability checking, pre-install inspection and version-controlled backup rather than only downloading a skill directory.
The first stage compares the requested capability with the existing library to flag redundant tools. The security stage inspects incoming code and instructions, uses NVIDIA SkillSpector when installed, looks for another local auditor or falls back to static heuristics. The final stage installs accepted files and routes them to a skills backup repository.
The author reports concrete limitations from building it. Legitimate DevOps scripts that touch Docker or system sockets could be classified as high risk and require manual review. A download-time scan also does not constrain a process after it starts. Installing a skill does not rewrite an already active agent conversation.
The result is a published inspection-and-persistence tool explicitly built with Hermes, accompanied by source and installation instructions. It is not evidence that every accepted skill is safe. Human review of warnings and runtime isolation remain separate responsibilities, and the account does not provide an independently measured false-negative rate.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: Reddit · _P_R_I_M_E
Frequently asked questions
What happens without SkillSpector?
The tool looks for another local auditor and can fall back to static heuristics.
What can trigger false positives?
Legitimate DevOps scripts using Docker or system sockets.
Does inspection sandbox the installed process?
No. The author explicitly separates download-time scanning from runtime isolation.
More details
About this account
The author and Hermes built capability comparison before downloading a requested skill. The tool added an adaptive inspection stage and accepted-file backup routing.
Original firsthand build post and repository opened. Static scanning is not runtime containment, and claimed overlap thresholds are tool policy rather than measured security efficacy. Source-available noncommercial licensing is disclosed. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use; no original task prompt was published in the verified account.
Credit: _P_R_I_M_E — Reddit
Source published 18 Sept 2026
Source checked 14 Oct 2026
Tools and topics
Hermes Agent · Skill Installer · NVIDIA SkillSpector · GitHub CLI
Skill supply chain · Static inspection
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.