Meta Muse lists a Quest 3 and negotiates with buyers
James Camp had equipment he wanted to sell but was away at the gym. He asked Meta Muse to create a Facebook Marketplace listing for his Meta Quest 3. Camp says Muse had access to his Facebook account and Messenger, and he then gave it instructions for handling buyer negotiations: a floor price and guidance on how hard it could push. He says the agent had permission to negotiate within those bounds.
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Review the relevant records, explain each action you recommend, and pause for my approval before deleting, negotiating, paying or changing any account.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source poster / publisher
- James Camp (@JamesonCamp)
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- Source link checked
- Reported result
- Camp reports that Muse listed the Quest 3 and was authorized to negotiate. No buyer, sale price or completed transaction is reported.
- Human involvement
- Camp set a price floor and granted permission to negotiate. The source does not say whether final sale acceptance or payment required another approval.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- While at the gym, Camp asked Muse to list his Meta Quest 3 on Facebook Marketplace.
- He gave Muse access to Facebook and Messenger and specified a minimum price and negotiation approach.
- Muse could respond to interested buyers within the permission Camp set; no completed sale is reported.
James Camp had equipment he wanted to sell but was away at the gym. He asked Meta Muse to create a Facebook Marketplace listing for his Meta Quest 3. Camp says Muse had access to his Facebook account and Messenger, and he then gave it instructions for handling buyer negotiations: a floor price and guidance on how hard it could push. He says the agent had permission to negotiate within those bounds.
The useful pattern is a delegated sale with a human-defined limit. Muse could prepare the listing and respond to interested buyers while Camp was away, but the post does not report that the headset sold, what price the listing used or whether a buyer made an offer. It also does not explain whether Camp needed to approve the final sale or whether Muse could arrange pickup or payment.
Anyone adapting this workflow should set the minimum acceptable price, describe the item’s condition accurately, and require approval before accepting an offer or sharing a pickup address. Camp’s post documents a listing and negotiation setup, not a completed sale or proof that every buyer message was handled correctly.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: X · James Camp (@JamesonCamp)
Frequently asked questions
What did Muse list?
Camp says it created a Facebook Marketplace listing for his Meta Quest 3.
What negotiation boundary did Camp set?
He says he gave Muse a floor price and instructions on how hard to negotiate, with permission to act within those limits.
Did the source say the headset sold?
No. Camp reports creating the listing and authorizing negotiation, but does not report a sale or final price.
More details
About this account
Muse created the listing and could negotiate with buyers within the floor price and instructions Camp supplied.
Reviewed archived direct X capture (HTTP 200, 2026-10-15) for original text, author and date; a fresh current web-reader fetch returned 403. Camp summarizes his request and negotiation rules but does not publish an exact prompt; the entry prompt is editorially suggested.
Credit: James Camp (@JamesonCamp) — X
Source published
Added to Agents In Use
Source checked
Tools and topics
Meta Muse · Facebook Marketplace · Facebook Messenger
Facebook Marketplace · resale · price negotiation
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.