Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
1005 additions

OpenClaw turns podcast scripts into comic packages

Diagram Wolf reports processing 20 podcast scripts through Opal with OpenClaw, downloading 32 ZIPs and organising text drafts and comic images locally.

Published note.comAgent: OpenClaw
FROM THE SOURCE

Original prompt

Shared by the source author. See source notes for context.

Opal連携ワークフロー構築 — Podcast台本からマルチユースコンテンツ(メルマガ、Xポスト、4コマ漫画)を一括生成し、Obsidianに自動整理

What happened

Diagram Wolf reports processing 20 podcast scripts through Opal with OpenClaw, downloading 32 ZIPs and organising text drafts and comic images locally.

Reported by 図解師★ウルフ (Diagram Wolf)

How the agent did it

  1. Put numbered Markdown podcast scripts in a defined input folder.
  2. Use Browser Relay to submit scripts to the existing Opal workflow.
  3. Wait for completion, download ZIPs and retry stalled generation.

Where a person stepped in

The author sets the source and output folders. Browser Relay requires reattachment during longer runs; the account does not document item-by-item editorial approval or publication.

Diagram Wolf delegated a batch of numbered Markdown podcast scripts to OpenClaw. The agent used the Clawdbot Browser Relay extension to operate an existing Google Opal workflow that produced newsletter drafts, X posts and four-panel comics. It inspected the browser, found the input, submitted each script, waited for generation and downloaded the resulting archive.

The reported run processed scripts 0001 through 0020 and downloaded 32 ZIPs, including repeated downloads after retries. Comic generation for script 0018 stalled at 99 percent and succeeded on another attempt. A PowerShell sorting step separated images from text and added podcast-number prefixes to prevent files overwriting one another. The final deliverables list contains 60 text files and 31 PNG images; an earlier sorting count says 30 images, so the account's counts are not completely consistent.

The practical constraint was the browser connection. Idle periods of roughly five to ten minutes disconnected the relay, and closing or reloading the tab disconnected it immediately. Runs of 20 to 30 items needed one or two reattachments. The author configured the input and output locations; the account does not describe approving individual generated drafts or publishing them. Its demonstrated result is a locally organised content batch with recovery work, rather than proven editorial quality.

Prompt
Original prompt

Source: Blog · 図解師★ウルフ (Diagram Wolf)

Frequently asked questions

Why are there more ZIPs than scripts?

The author reports 20 scripts and 32 ZIP downloads because some generations were retried; this is not 32 distinct source scripts.

What interrupts a long batch?

Browser Relay disconnects after idle periods or when its tab closes or reloads. The reported longer runs required one or two reattachments.

Are the outputs already approved for publication?

No publication or individual editorial approval is documented. The concrete deliverables are organised text drafts and comic images, with differing image counts in two sections.

More details

Remaining steps

  1. Sort extracted text and images with PowerShell using podcast-number prefixes.
  2. Convert generated JPG images to PNG and inspect the resulting batch.

About this account

OpenClaw operates the browser across multiple scripts, observes completion states and retries a stalled generation; local scripting sorts and converts the downloaded outputs.

Firsthand account by 図解師★ウルフ (Diagram Wolf); original publication date verified against Japanese page byline 2026年2月3日 06:13. Outcomes are the author’s reports, not independently reproduced. Original Japanese instruction excerpt transcribed from the author’s instruction-purpose section; not the complete workflow instructions.

Credit: 図解師★ウルフ (Diagram Wolf)

Source published 3 Feb 2026

Source checked 14 Oct 2026

Tools and topics

OpenClaw · Clawdbot Browser Relay · Google Opal · PowerShell · Obsidian

Podcast repurposing · Four-panel comics · Batch downloads

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.