Replit Agent builds GreyCRM in stages
A sales professional publishing as memling reports building GreyCRM with Replit Agent, then adding email, video letters and a calendar while users exposed unresolved issues.
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Build a staged CRM prototype with the approved contact and communication features. Deploy a review version, record test failures and address feedback before expanding the next feature set.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source author
- memling
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- 16 Jan 2025
- Source link checked
- 15 Oct 2026
- Reported result
- A sales professional publishing as memling reports building GreyCRM with Replit Agent, then adding email, video letters and a calendar while users exposed unresolved issues.
- Human involvement
- The author prioritizes features and responds to user feedback. Contact-creation failure and access-control concerns remain visible in the discussion.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- The builder asks Replit Agent to create a personal CRM and deploys an initial version.
- Telephony is added using packages and a limited Twilio account.
- Mobile feedback guides planned revisions.
A sales professional publishing as memling used Replit Agent to build GreyCRM because existing CRM tools felt expensive and overloaded. The January forum post links a deployed first version and says the core functionality was present, while several desired features remained unfinished.
The builder describes adding telephony with freely available packages and a limited Twilio account. Feedback immediately revealed a poor mobile layout. He planned to improve responsiveness while explaining that the initial application was intended for desktop use.
A later update on January twenty-eighth reports email integration, video recording for sales letters and a calendar for meetings. This is a sequence of incremental application work rather than a claim that the initial version already contained every feature in the title. The author says feature requests were increasingly handled in a single prompt, without establishing a controlled speed comparison.
The discussion also preserves a useful failure. Another user tried to create a contact and reported that it failed. A separate comment suggested login should appear before the dashboard. The evidence supports a deployed personal CRM under development, with human feature choices and external feedback. It does not establish a production-ready customer database or independently verified access controls.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: replit.discourse.group · memling
Frequently asked questions
Were email and calendar in the first version?
They were reported in a later January twenty-eighth update.
What did user feedback reveal?
A poor mobile view and a later failed attempt to create a contact.
Was it described as a mature CRM?
No. The builder called the releases versions 0.1 and 0.2 and continued adding features.
More details
Remaining steps
- A later update reports email, video recording and a calendar, while a user reports contact creation failing.
About this account
Replit Agent generated and extended GreyCRM features over successive iterations, including telephony, email, video and calendar functionality.
Firsthand account opened and read. Outcome is source-reported, not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use. January 16 original post; later updates supply later features. No production or security guarantee.
Credit: memling
Source published 16 Jan 2025
Source checked 15 Oct 2026
Tools and topics
Replit Agent · GreyCRM · Twilio
Replit Agent · GreyCRM · Twilio
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.