Agents In Use
What’s new todayLast update
499 additions

How to use Unknown to build an ebook audiobook service

The author produced ebookaloud, an ebook narration product targeting m4b output, and shared a free sample demonstrating its voice and format.

TRY A BOUNDED VERSION

Prompt to try

Editorial adaptation, not the source author’s exact prompt. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.

Build [ebook narration service] using [voice model] and [GPU service]. For each feature, plan, implement, test, review, correct, and commit. Use separate evaluation agents for [extraction pipeline] and [synthesis pipeline]. Produce [audiobook format] and pause for human review of critical code sections.

What happened

The author produced ebookaloud, an ebook narration product targeting m4b output, and shared a free sample demonstrating its voice and format.

Reported by flatline on Hacker News

How the agent did it

  1. Plan each change with the coding agents.
  2. Implement, test, review, correct, and commit each feature.
  3. Run separate evaluations of extraction and synthesis.

Where a person stepped in

The author read critical generated sections and held extensive conversations with DS Pro about each step.

A person approved each step before the agent continued.

The author built ebookaloud to convert ebooks into audiobooks, using the open Kokoro voice model and a cloud GPU approach after struggling with CPU inference on a laptop. Their goals were to explore multi-agent coding workflows and create a product specifically for ebook narration. They reported that DeepSeek v4 in OpenCode wrote 99% of the application.

Every change or feature followed a plan, implement, test, review, correct, and commit cycle using a mix of Pro and Flash agents. Implementation generally involved one or two concurrent workers. A separate evaluation agent checked parts of the extraction and synthesis pipeline, with eight to ten evaluations running concurrently. The author later set up Claude Code and compared Opus alongside DeepSeek.

The author wrote none of the code but read critical sections and discussed each stage extensively with DS Pro. The product targeted m4b output, pay as you go pricing, and good enough narration quality. A free sample demonstrated the voice and format. Other Kokoro languages and PDF extraction remained possible future additions. Who it's for: Experienced developers willing to supervise agents while building a focused narration product.

Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)

Source: Hacker News · flatline

Frequently asked questions

How did the author supervise generated code?

They read critical sections and discussed each step extensively with DS Pro, although they did not write any code themselves.

What output did the product target?

The author targeted m4b generation for an audiobook experience, with pay as you go pricing and good enough output quality. PDF extraction and other languages were future possibilities.

More details

Remaining steps

  1. Set up Claude Code and compare Opus with DeepSeek.

About this account

Agents wrote the code and followed a staged development cycle, with separate agents evaluating pipeline quality.

Platform: Hacker News. Attribution: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48661083. Prompt: Suggested (written by Agents In Use, not the author's). Sourced by the Agents In Use pipeline.

Credit: flatline on Hacker News

Source published 24 Jun 2026

Source checked 14 Oct 2026

Tools and topics

OpenCode · DeepSeek v4 · Kokoro · Claude Code

Audiobooks · TTS · Agent workflows

Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.