Manus compares five agencies for a client report

A client asked Ejaz Ahmed for a competitor analysis of a UK AI marketing automation agency serving small and medium businesses. Ahmed supplied three competitor URLs and asked Manus to find two more, compare five dimensions and prepare a structured report with a final comparison table.

The agent returned an eleven-page document after about eighteen minutes. Ahmed describes website-derived positioning statements, publicly available pricing, individual competitor sections and a consistent comparison table. A separate gap analysis identified that the reviewed agencies did not explicitly serve founders who wanted to understand AI before committing to purchase.

The draft still needed his judgment. Missing public prices were replaced with explicitly flagged estimates, which Ahmed warns against quoting directly. He added explanations of why the positioning worked and edited a corporate, repetitive writing style before using the deliverable. The article gives inconsistent precise editing durations, so this entry preserves the human editing requirement without choosing one number.

This was one real June client task, not a systematic evaluation. The public account does not reveal the five companies or reproduce the complete report, and it offers no measured campaign or sales outcome. The reusable workflow is to seed a bounded competitor set, let the agent extend it, compare the same dimensions and separate observed website facts from inferred pricing and human strategic interpretation.

Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)

Source: Blog · Ejaz Ahmed