Manus sends a daily competitor-ad research report to Slack
A marketer set up Manus to collect audience discussions and competitor ads daily, compare themes and gaps, then send a research report to Slack.
x.com
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Each day, review these approved audience sources and competitor ad libraries. Link and date every finding, group recurring themes, label uncertain interpretations, and send a sourced brief to our Slack channel for human review.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source poster / publisher
- Camm (@cjfeth)
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- Source link checked
- Reported result
- Camm reports an automated daily research report delivered to Slack for creative strategists. No campaign outcome, measured time saving or validated market gap is reported.
- Human involvement
- The source describes the report as input for creative strategists, not an automatic campaign decision. It does not explain source validation or review controls.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- Manus searches the places the author’s target audiences use and segments findings into themes such as new angles and failed solutions.
- It scans competitor ad libraries and reviews ad copy and headlines.
- It benchmarks the ad material against the audience research, builds a report and sends it to Slack.
Camm describes a recurring research workflow built in Manus for a creative strategy team. Each day, the automation searches the places where the company’s target audiences spend time, gathers and segments findings such as new angles, failed solutions and customer awareness, then scans competitors’ ad libraries and reads their primary text and headlines. Manus compares those ads with the audience research, produces a master report and sends it into Slack.
The practical value is the combined brief: audience conversations and competitor creative arrive together, so strategists can review possible gaps without manually assembling separate research streams. The post says the report is delivered automatically and was intended to increase the team’s output. It does not name the monitored sources, competitors, report examples or any campaign result, so it does not establish that the ideas improved performance or uncovered a validated market opportunity.
To adapt the workflow, define which public sources and competitors are in scope, and require links and dates beside each finding. Treat the output as a research queue for a strategist to check. The suggested prompt below is editorial; Camm does not share the automation’s actual instruction or configuration.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: X · Camm (@cjfeth)
Frequently asked questions
What does the Manus automation collect?
Camm says it gathers audience discussions and segments themes such as new angles, failed solutions and awareness, while also scanning competitor ad libraries.
Where does the report go?
The author says Manus builds a master report and sends it directly into Slack.
Did it prove that a marketing campaign performed better?
No. The source describes the research workflow and its intended use, but gives no campaign results or measured uplift.
More details
About this account
The author says the Manus automation runs daily, gathers and compares research sources, compiles a report and delivers it to Slack.
Reviewed archived direct X capture (HTTP 200, 2026-10-15); current web-reader fetch returned 403. The post names no sources or campaign results. It does not share the automation’s exact prompt.
Credit: Camm (@cjfeth) — X
Source published
Added to Agents In Use
Source checked
Tools and topics
Manus · Slack · Competitor ad libraries
competitor research · ad analysis · Slack report
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.