OpenClaw sends daily Socialcrawl post research
vaaselene used OpenClaw with Socialcrawl to collect recent high-performing social posts each morning, then wrote original posts using those references.
news.ycombinator.com
Suggested prompt
Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use, not the source author. Replace bracketed inputs and review tool permissions first.
Each morning, use my approved Socialcrawl connection to find relevant posts trending in the last twenty-four hours. Return source links and useful reference examples for my own writing, without copying or publishing anything.
Reach people exploring AI agents
See placements →Evidence at a glance
Sourced account- Source author
- vaaselene
- Original account
- Read the source ↗
- Published
- 20 Apr 2026
- Source link checked
- 15 Oct 2026
- Reported result
- vaaselene used OpenClaw with Socialcrawl to collect recent high-performing social posts each morning, then wrote original posts using those references.
- Human involvement
- The author built Socialcrawl and wrote the resulting posts. The agent supplied research; the reported views and follower growth were not independently measured or causally attributed.
A linked account supports attribution. It does not mean we independently reproduced its result.
Report an issue with this case
Open correction emailOpens your email app with the case link included. Nothing is sent automatically.
How the agent did it
- Connect OpenClaw to the Socialcrawl data API.
- Collect social posts trending in the previous twenty-four hours.
- Deliver the reference material to the author each morning.
vaaselene wanted to grow an audience across X, Threads and LinkedIn, but found it difficult to spend hours looking for useful reference posts. The author built Socialcrawl, an API for pulling data from multiple social platforms, and connected it to OpenClaw for a daily research routine.
The agent sends posts trending during the previous twenty-four hours each morning. The author uses that material as a reference when writing personal content, replacing the repeated manual search for examples. The account identifies both the collection tool and the recurring delivery schedule, rather than simply saying that an agent handles marketing.
For the previous week, vaaselene reports 100,000 Threads views and 200 additional followers. Those are the author's observations from a short period. The account supplies no control group, baseline or breakdown showing how much of the change came from the agent, the research API or the author's own writing. It also promotes Socialcrawl, so the builder's commercial involvement is relevant.
The useful outcome is a bounded research feed followed by human composition. This source does not establish automatic publication, copied posts, paid campaign performance or a repeatable guarantee of audience growth.
Prompt
Suggested prompt (written by Agents In Use, not the author's)
Source: Hacker News · vaaselene
Frequently asked questions
Did OpenClaw publish the posts?
The source says the author used the discovered posts as references to write personal content. It does not document automatic publication.
What growth was reported?
The author reports 100,000 Threads views and 200 followers over one week, without a controlled comparison.
Was the author affiliated with the tool?
Yes. vaaselene says they built Socialcrawl and promotes its signup credits in the same account.
More details
Remaining steps
- Use the examples to write original posts and observe the reported past week of audience results.
About this account
OpenClaw used Socialcrawl to gather recently trending social posts and delivered reference material to the author each morning.
Firsthand public account opened and read; author and original timestamp verified against the official Hacker News item API. Outcomes are author reports, not independently reproduced. Suggested prompt written by Agents In Use.
Credit: vaaselene on Hacker News
Source published 20 Apr 2026
Source checked 15 Oct 2026
Tools and topics
OpenClaw · Socialcrawl · X · Threads · LinkedIn
Content research · Daily research · Social media
Editorial completeness: 100/100. Measures documented fields, not agent performance or verified outcomes.