Comet researches ten days of founder posts

Geetika Mehta gives Comet a bounded research task: inspect Aravind Srinivas's recent profile posts about the browser over the preceding ten days. The assistant navigates to the profile, expands posts and examines multiple updates, rather than relying only on snippets visible in a search result.

Its summary covers discussions of phishing-email protection, Comet Plus, early-adopter feedback and the Invisible team acquisition. Comet also enters comment threads to capture community reactions and concerns. Those two evidence types serve different purposes: the founder's posts describe the company's perspective, while replies show how some readers responded.

Mehta reports receiving a comprehensive summary within minutes, but does not independently measure coverage or fact accuracy. The output is research into public communications, not verification that every discussed feature or business claim is true. The useful scope is a named person, a named subject and a defined date window, followed by inspection of expanded posts and their replies. A repeatable version should preserve source links and distinguish statements by the author from audience commentary. The suggested prompt here reflects those reviewable outputs; the original prompt excerpt remains the author's actual instruction, including its spelling of the first name.

Prompt
Original prompt

Source: Blog · Geetika Mehta